Bizcovering > Business and Society

Protectionism and American Automakers’ Woes

How the Chicken Tax and other protectionist policies helped pave the way for American auto manufacturers' decline.

In his 1998 Origin of Competitive Strength, Akira Kawahara states that Detroit’s auto makers started experiencing financial woes in the 1970s because “they failed to reinvest their profits, their products had deteriorated, their production facilities were outdated, and their quality and productivity had become inferior to those of Japanese auto makers.”  To this impressive list of reason, I think we should add one more: the frozen chicken tax.

In 1964, the European Union imposed a tariff on frozen chickens coming from the United States.  The US, prompted by American auto makers, then imposed a 25 percent tariff on imported trucks.  The tariff was targeted at West Germany (which had urged the EU to adopt the Chicken Tax) because the most imported trucks were, at the time, coming from West Germany. 

At the same time, and at behest of an already-struggling Detroit, Congress exempted SUVs, light trucks and minivans from its safety and emissions standards of 1975.  These cars were also excluded from the Gas Guzzler Tax Congress passed in 1978.  The result was that the protected SUVs, light trucks, and minivans were less expensive to manufacture, less expensive to buy, and very profitable for Detroit.  By the year 2000, SUVs, light trucks, and minivans accounted for approximately two-thirds of American auto manufacturers’ profits.

At the same time, these rules meant that if the Japanese or European auto makers hoped to compete at all in the US market, they had to invest in researching and developing as well as mass-producing smaller, fuel-efficient vehicles like the Toyota Prius.  This innovation allowed European and Japanese manufacturers to capture the emerging green market and to sell their products domestically, where due to exorbitantly high gas prices, fuel-efficient cars were in great demand.

It also meant, of course, that when the bottom fell out of the gas guzzler market, European and Japanese auto makers were well-positioned to reap the benefits of the Chicken Tax while Detroit is now reeling from the very protectionism they had demanded for the past four decades.

9
Liked It
I Like It!
Related Articles
Free Trade Agreements Explained  |  That's "Mr. Socialist" to You
Comments (4)
#1 by  Mary Contrary, Nov 10, 2008
Very very interesting stuff! Good job!
#2 by  Liane Schmidt, Nov 10, 2008
You know your history - nice article!

Blessings.

Sincerely,

-Liane Schmidt.
#3 by  eddiego65, Nov 11, 2008
Interesting and eye-opening!
#4 by hfj, Jan 6, 2009
American automakers have let greed stand in their way of being competitive with foreign automakers. Toyota, Nissan, and Honda have taken over the market because they make a more dependable and efficient vehicle that appeals to the American consumer. That is why GM, Ford, and Chyslar are in the shape they are now.
Post Your Comment:
Name:  
Copy the code into this box:  
Post comment with your Triond credentials?
Inside Bizcovering

Accounting

 /

Business

 /

Business and Society

 /

Business Law

 /

E-Commerce

 /

Education and Training

 /

Employment

 /

History

 /

International Business and Trade

 /

Investing

 /

Major Companies

 /

Management

 /

Marketing and Advertising

 /

Opportunities

 /

Real Estate

 /

Small Business


Popular Tags
Popular Writers


An IVA is an alternative to bankruptcy.
Powered by
Bizcovering
About Us
Terms of Use
Privacy Policy
Services
Submit an Article
Advertise with Us
Contact

© 2007 Copyright Stanza Ltd. All Rights Reserved.